of course I was not trying to convince you. I was saying， not exclusively to you, there are ophthalmologists who have different views, for more objective assessment, shall seek advice from those with optician service . my friend visited one of those, he gave different views to her.
香港視光and ophthalmologist 係分家。Due to conflict of interest, most ophthalmologists in HK do not support OK lens. however in the states and Canada ， this treatment was given at least 20 years ago by ophthalmologists in North America.
furthermore, those who want to obtain more valid info, should ask in detail the reason why they don\'t support. as far as I know neither there is scientific proof as to this lens have long term effect on eyes, nor it greatly impact children eyeball. most cases are to do with wearing overtime, improper cleansing, which are the same as wearing day time lens. on the contrary, the demand is growing, nz firms have joined in developing lens. it can be now upto 1000+. the demand is growing for adults market too.
OK lens are still the most effective way to suppress growth among various options. yes infected cases are present, but long term effect are not known.
I am reminding ppl here so seek advice from
ophthalmologist with optician service. almost all ophthalmologist who don\'t have optician won\'t recommend this to you.
發表於 
返回列表
