嬰兒用品

跳至

首頁
1

尾頁
   0


大宅

積分: 3470


1#
發表於 09-3-10 13:06 |只看該作者
想轉奶粉, 發覺日本奶粉的成份真是比較多及接近母乳, 我本身是做化學研究,所以都好細心研究過各種日本奶份的成份,除了基本成份外,大概不同的是成份包括:
DHA、AA,核苷酸, 胡蘿蔔素, 牛磺酸, 膽鹼, 唾液酸(sialic acid) . 好似只有雪印思敏兒同Beanstalk有晒所有成份.明治就有較高DHA/AA,但又缺乏了最重要的膽鹼, 唾液酸(sialic acid),最新研究話這2種成份為母乳的優良之處,對腦部發育同加強抵抗力尤其重要,有的奶粉都加左, 咁要選多種營養的還是要高DHA的好呢?


成份比較:

http://babymatrix.com.hk/index_topic.php?did=16&didpath=/8/15/16


大宅

積分: 4212


2#
發表於 09-3-10 13:39 |只看該作者
咁請問豆奶係咪真係無咁好營養定其實同牛奶差唔多, 我個B飲緊雅培豆奶, 好驚唔夠營養......
原帖由 lingchai 於 09-3-10 13:06 發表
想轉奶粉, 發覺日本奶粉的成份真是比較多及接近母乳, 我本身是做化學研究,所以都好細心研究過各種日本奶份的成份,除了基本成份外,大概不同的是成份包括:
DHA、AA,核苷酸, 胡蘿蔔素, 牛磺酸, 膽鹼, 唾液酸(sialic aci ...


大宅

積分: 2672


3#
發表於 09-3-10 16:26 |只看該作者
I have done some research but couldn't find any reliable source to quote the min/max amount of DHA and ARA one should get from the formulas, but just that since babies get DHA and ARA from their mother during the third trimester, but the transfer is cut short when a baby is born prematurely, thus it seems especially imporatnt for those pre-mature babies. Also studies published showed that full-term infants fed DHA- and ARA-supplemented formula had significantly better visual acuity than infants who did not receive the supplements. And a study published in The Journal of Pediatrics states that DHA and ARA enhance both cognitive and physical growth in preterm infants. However, there aren't any long-term studies confirming the safety of these substances, although there's no evidence suggesting that these additives are harmful to babies, either. So the answer is yes, DHA and ARA are good for babies but just that whether your babies can absorb that extra amount while trading off some other nutrients like sialic acid!


大宅

積分: 3470


4#
發表於 09-3-10 17:08 |只看該作者
所有市面上的infant配方奶/豆粉一定可以提供足夠的基本營養給bb,只不過額外的成份會對腦部發展及增強抵抗力有幫助.我本來想選明治,但又聽的同事膽鹼, 唾液酸(sialic acid)是很重要的.所以現在有的猶疑.香港既奶粉都無一隻有晒所有成份,好難諗.既然成份高不一定有用,咁係唔係要選較全面配方的?


Sialic acid及膽酸用處參考:
http://www.look4.com.tw/sa/sap2.htm


原帖由 chuliu 於 09-3-10 16:26 發表
I have done some research but couldn't find any reliable source to quote the min/max amount of DHA and ARA one should get from the formulas, but just that since babies get DHA and ARA from their mothe ...


禁止訪問

積分: 33992

好媽媽勳章 2011精緻種植勳章 環保接龍勳章 BK Milk勳章 hashtag影視迷勳章


5#
發表於 09-3-10 17:30 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


男爵府

積分: 6261

好媽媽勳章 醒目開學勳章 畀面勳章 環保接龍勳章


6#
發表於 09-3-10 17:38 |只看該作者
我仔仔係飲明治呀,但之前聽人講話icreo好d同全面d就轉左,但轉左之後先發覺根本icreo唔適合我bb,飲完勁忟憎,勁喊,始終都轉返明治,所以我覺得都係最緊要同bb夾


複式洋房

積分: 142


7#
發表於 09-3-10 22:15 |只看該作者
甘即系检边支好啊


大宅

積分: 3470


8#
發表於 09-3-10 23:54 |只看該作者
思敏兒同beanstalk成份好全面,好似唔錯.我bb宜家飲更A+,成日覺得佢係咁賣廣告,又係咁加價,bb食左又呵硬便便,所以想轉奶粉,比較之下先發覺原來佢好多成份都比日本奶粉缺少.


大宅

積分: 2672


9#
發表於 09-3-11 00:19 |只看該作者
I've been breastfeeding my baby while complementing with 思敏兒 since his birth the only problem is he prefers breastmilk to formulas yet I don't have enough breastmilk to feed him


複式洋房

積分: 142


10#
發表於 09-3-15 17:32 |只看該作者
即话bean stalk比A+成分全面?


男爵府

積分: 6387


11#
發表於 09-3-15 19:49 |只看該作者
份報告好似冇思敏兒喎


複式洋房

積分: 142


12#
發表於 09-3-15 21:03 |只看該作者
想从日本奶粉(bean stalk)转去A+.结果你话。。。晕


大宅

積分: 3470


13#
發表於 09-3-15 23:27 |只看該作者
思敏兒同Beanstalk(較重建立抵抗力). 都有晒以上既成份,好全面, 但DHA就唔高. A+(較重腦發展). 無胡蘿蔔素同nucleotide , 但DHA 好高. 明治就無Sailic acid, 但有足夠既胡蘿蔔素同nucleotide,而 DHA比A+仲高(較重腦發展). 日本雪印又無sailic acid,DHA又唔高,好似一般.我 bb宜家3個月大,飲開A+, 而家轉左思敏兒(因成份同beanstalk差唔多但平的), 都唔錯, 我覺得轉下奶粉都好,可以有唔同既營養. 我都有諗過6個月先轉,但好多朋友都話到時bb可以食其它野, 都飲少好多奶, 食邊隻都無所謂啦!

首頁
1

尾頁

跳至