chan803 寫道:
You still can't get my point
1) No one could stop 葉劉 to ask for 人大釋法 or do anything. Not 民主派, not u nor me, not even if half billion of HK people said no (see the art. 23 case)
2) If 人大常委會 believes that 終審庭的判決 is wrong, it could've chosen to 釋法 to 'correct it'. No one could stop them.
[quote]
henrykingdom 寫道:
chan803,
你愈講愈遠了, 現在講的是” 莊豐源案”, 當時葉劉希望人大釋法, 但民主派大力反對之後, 人大沒有一意孤行, 最終沒有釋法, 才會有今天的局面.
睡覺 寫道:
會唔會係佢地想等d市民火遮眼時,只要杜絕到,乜方法都肯,到時中央話﹕「你地求我釋法干預架咋,第時有乜唔滿意,唔好嘈,唔係我逼你地架﹗」
係咪咁?
[quote]釋法開左頭,會唔會以後一發不可收拾根本無人知,所以到呢一刻我都覺得唔可以靠中央,靠釋法解決問題!當日班議員反對釋法係無錯,只係唔明今日仲有咁多野可以做,佢地點解唔做!!!
chan803 寫道:
You still can't get my point
1) No one could stop 葉劉 to ask for 人大釋法 or do anything. Not 民主派, not u nor me, not even if half billion of HK people said no (see the art. 23 case)
2) If 人大常委會 believes that 終審庭的判決 is wrong, it could've chosen to 釋法 to 'correct it'. No one could stop them.
[quote]
henrykingdom 寫道:
chan803,
你愈講愈遠了, 現在講的是” 莊豐源案”, 當時葉劉希望人大釋法, 但民主派大力反對之後, 人大沒有一意孤行, 最終沒有釋法, 才會有今天的局面.
deandut 寫道:
[quote]
yvonne 寫道:
大陸孕婦來港的問題,根本香港可以從更改福利條款/入境方面解决,唔使修改/解譯基本法,政府唔做賴落議員,甘政府肯做,邊個議員反對米以後唔需投佢票羅.講黎都廢嘅.
大家應該齊心問:政府點解唔做???????
henrykingdom 寫道:
葉劉當時如果一意孤行要求人大釋法, 就一定做到?
你當班民主派咁無用啊?! 當年成班大律師穿黑衣在終審庭門口抗議人大釋法的新聞賣到全世界, 美國國務院同英國都借勢發表言論, 佢地有幾多影响力可想而知, 葉劉在當時無可能螳臂當車.
無人希望動不動就釋法, 但亦唔代表基本法或其他國家的法例每一條條例都是真理而不可質疑.
[quote]
chan803 寫道:
You still can't get my point
1) No one could stop 葉劉 to ask for 人大釋法 or do anything. Not 民主派, not u nor me, not even if half billion of HK people said no (see the art. 23 case)
2) If 人大常委會 believes that 終審庭的判決 is wrong, it could've chosen to 釋法 to 'correct it'. No one could stop them.
henrykingdom 寫道:
你信唔信到時又有人出來幫班大陸BB申請法援打官司話港府歧視佢地, 又叫平機會用公堂告政府話條例違反人權, 不平等啦.
佢地唔駛比錢打官司架, 又係搵納稅人來玩! 班大律師又荷包腫脹
[quote]
deandut 寫道:
[quote]
yvonne 寫道:
大陸孕婦來港的問題,根本香港可以從更改福利條款/入境方面解决,唔使修改/解譯基本法,政府唔做賴落議員,甘政府肯做,邊個議員反對米以後唔需投佢票羅.講黎都廢嘅.
大家應該齊心問:政府點解唔做???????
chan803 寫道:
henrykingdom,
In case you don't know, before 1997/7/1, there's no 終審庭 in HK. 英國"書密院" is HK's 終審庭.
Someone has suggested to keep it that way, but Chinese government just can't live with that idea......
chan803 寫道:
But did it stop 人大常委會 from carry out another 釋法? As far as I could remember, the answer is NO.
Again, if 人大常委會 believes that 終審庭的判決 is wrong, it could've chosen to 釋法 to 'correct it'. No one could stop them.
Don't think the opinion of '民主派' weight too much on Chinese government's mind.
Make no mistake that '民主派' is the '螳' and the Chinese government is the '車'.
[quote]
henrykingdom 寫道:
葉劉當時如果一意孤行要求人大釋法, 就一定做到?
你當班民主派咁無用啊?! 當年成班大律師穿黑衣在終審庭門口抗議人大釋法的新聞賣到全世界, 美國國務院同英國都借勢發表言論, 佢地有幾多影响力可想而知, 葉劉在當時無可能螳臂當車.
無人希望動不動就釋法, 但亦唔代表基本法或其他國家的法例每一條條例都是真理而不可質疑.
superbaby2005 寫道:
其實計我話而家就係中央玩我地既時候啦!因為佢地針對香港事事講民主講自由講人權!所以而家就用人權用民主既法例黎玩返我地囉,如果我無記錯係97回歸既時候,當時陳佐洱就話過我地香港太好福利,一定會車燬人亡,咁跟住就係香港社福界既一筆過撥款,而家民主派又話選特首,共產黨梗係搵d野玩下我地d香港人啦,唔通佢地唔知連大陸都唔可以話隨便可以攞戶口咩!何況係特區既戶口呢?所以事實係中央要玩香港,所以事件由始至終,有無特首或民主黨........出黎講過半句呢?連長毛十下十下去攪鐘樓都唔敢去攪班大陸婆來港生仔就知一二啦!!!
superbaby2005 寫道:
其實計我話而家就係中央玩我地既時候啦!因為佢地針對香港事事講民主講自由講人權!所以而家就用人權用民主既法例黎玩返我地囉,如果我無記錯係97回歸既時候,當時陳佐洱就話過我地香港太好福利,一定會車燬人亡,咁跟住就係香港社福界既一筆過撥款,而家民主派又話選特首,共產黨梗係搵d野玩下我地d香港人啦,唔通佢地唔知連大陸都唔可以話隨便可以攞戶口咩!何況係特區既戶口呢?所以事實係中央要玩香港,所以事件由始至終,有無特首或民主黨........出黎講過半句呢?連長毛十下十下去攪鐘樓都唔敢去攪班大陸婆來港生仔就知一二啦!!!