dickykwan 寫道:
[quote]
StanleyChan 寫道:
其實都提過好多次,唔好買D有壽險成份的保單來當儲蓄,儲蓄同保障要分開做,但係種係有咁多人買,有時都唔明點解?
遙遙爸爸 寫道:
OLmommy 買嘅係投資相連單, 蝕左四萬除左因為保險費用之外, 亦可能係投資失利.
傳統保單唔同投資相連單, 唔好混為一談. 傳統保單有保證回報同埋紅利兩部份, 基本上用時間換回報, 一段時間 (有長有短) 之後保證一定賺錢.
至於係保單借錢出黎, 如果正面睇, 有乜野投資可以有咁嘅彈性? 如果我買左股票或者基金, 又急需要錢, 就算股價好殘我都係要賣. 反而保單貸款容許我週轉, 又唔需要斷單, 又唔影響保障, 鬆動時候又可以放番落去.
SheepSheep 寫道:
Hi dummypimp
I agree with your point. Whole life policy lacks flexibility. Anything recommendation?
Sheep sheep
ntl 寫道:
dummypimp
You mention that "但我本人(同其他高層人員)也認為這些Plan遲早爆大鑊..."
What is the meaning of "爆大鑊"?![]()
![]()
dummypimp 寫道:
[quote]
ntl 寫道:
dummypimp
You mention that "但我本人(同其他高層人員)也認為這些Plan遲早爆大鑊..."
What is the meaning of "爆大鑊"?![]()
![]()
dummypimp 寫道:
[quote]
ntl 寫道:
dummypimp
You mention that "但我本人(同其他高層人員)也認為這些Plan遲早爆大鑊..."
What is the meaning of "爆大鑊"?![]()
![]()
esmond01 寫道:
dummypimp 你好似特登無講保險儲蓄最大作用就係人壽,
如果單單買人壽反而會比買人籌加儲蓄貴,而stanley話唔明
點解咁多人買係因為d人唔係淨係睇有無錢賺或者睇回報有
幾多,而係買份儲蓄保險買到份安心比自己同屋企人保障之
餘,又可以當儲蓄用,好似我依家睇緊HSBC份人壽咁,10
年後我既保單入面既現金價值已經高過我慮積繳交的保費,而最快16年後就可以唔使自己交保費,可以用紅利交,當然我可以一直交足25年,咁到我60歲時就有23萬可以羅番或由得佢滾存,減去以前交的本金仲可以賺到11萬利息。
SheepSheep 寫道:
Hi dummypimp
It seems you are very angry to them. Do you yourself have any bad experience? Want to share with us?
Sheep sheep

