It meaning that if AHPRA request bridging course, I need go AUS take the course, ...
You need to re-apply the registration to AHPRA after you complete your bridging course successfully. Of course you can either stay in AUS or back to Hong Kong during the application. ANMAC will only gives you a PR when you havea valid nurse registration.
而入面佢特別 Highlight 左 "only required to arrange for the relevant supporting documentation if they believe their qualification does meet the requirements for criteria 2 and 3. The documentation must be sent directly to AHPRA..."
而之前有人提過Officer話要 "comparable to the current nursing and midwifery accreditation standards and system in Australia", 睇個網頁就應該只係講緊 Criterion 3, Criterion 2無特別註明.
1. Name of quality assurance agency:
2. Effective period of registration/recognition/accreditation by quality assurance agency :
好多大學應該填左 Nursing Council of Hong Kong, 而其實應該填 UGC, 而個期應該填由Teaching and Learning Quality Process Reviews 開始就到而家先正確. 有機會佢地填左由 UGG成立左 OAC 開始.
Template 下面有句Encl: Copy of letter from named quality assurance agency, 應該係要一封由UGC比大學嘅信證明, 我諗一般通訊信件能證明有呢個 "regular review by an external quality assurance agency"就OK .
為咩都好, 我點都會APPEAL, 我SEND左5, 6 封EMAIL俾個CO, 一句到尾, 佢話叫我即管試下, 睇下個BOARD點講. 以下係一D我地EMAIL的節錄:
Me: It carried out the Teaching and Learning Quality Process Reviews in the 1990s and early 2000s, which focused primarily on the quality of teaching across different subject disciplines. The reports and documents of the Reviews can be found at:http://www.ugc.edu.hk/eng/ugc/publication/prog/tlqpr/tlqpr.htm. In particular, you may find the background information about the Reviews in the first document on the webpage, i.e. "Education Quality Work: The Hong Kong Experience - A handbook on good practices in assuring and improving teaching and learning quality". Attached are two review reports regarding HKU.
CO: I can confirm that we received accreditation information from your education provider and the Nursing Council of Hong Kong, however this relates to Criteria three, not two. I can’t seem to locate any documents from the University Grants Commission (UGC). I note from your attachments that there may have been some sort of accreditation in place before and during your course. Please note that to meet the criteria it is not only that the course was accredited, but that the accreditation is equivalent to the Australian standards.
Me: The reports above prove that UGC has reviewed and assured the quality of the higher education institutes in Hong Kong, including University of Hong Kong, since its establishment. Furthermore, the reports cover the review on learning environments, staff development and management, etc.
[size=13.3333px]CO: I understand that the information may be on their website, however we require the official confirmation to come directly from them confirming that your education provider was accredited at the time you were studying.
整個APPEAL PROCESS超痛苦, 來來回回的EMAIL又日日夜夜的等侯. UGC個悶悶WEBSITE我真係日睇夜睇, 想睇下仲有邊D嘢PROVE到佢對HKU的REVIEW, 除你講的teaching and learning process review, 其實仲有幾個report, particularly有一個management report, 不過結果係點, 好睇個BOARD