時政擂台 今日: 7|主題: 60272

http://newobserveronline.com/clinton-destroy-syria-israel/

美國政府公開的希拉里私人電郵顯示，身為國務卿的希拉里支持摧毀敘利亞，因為這樣可以保護以色列。

美國在敘利亞激起內戰，不是為了爭取民主自由，而是為了保護以色列。

Clinton: Destroy Syria for Israel

A newly-released HilaryClinton email confirmed that the Obama administration has deliberately provokedthe civil war in Syria as the “best way to help Israel.”

最新公開的希拉里電郵確認奧巴馬政府故意激起敘利亞內帳，作為協助以色列的最佳方法。

In an indication of her murderous andpsychopathic nature, Clinton also wrote that it was the “right thing” topersonally threaten Bashar Assad’s family with death.

In the email, released by Wikileaks, thenSecretary of State Clinton says that the “best way to help Israel” is to “useforce” in Syria to overthrow the government.

The document was one ofmany unclassified by the US Department of State undercase number F-2014-20439, Doc No. C05794498, following the uproar overClinton’s private email server kept at her house while she served as Secretaryof State from 2009 to 2013. (這些文件是由美國政府解密的希拉里私人電郵)

Although the Wikileaks transcript dates theemail as December 31, 2000, this is an error on their part, as the contents ofthe email (in particular the reference to May 2012 talks between Iran and thewest over its nuclear program in Istanbul) show that the email was in fact senton December 31, 2012.

The email makes it clear that it has beenUS policy from the very beginning to violently overthrow the Syriangovernment—and specifically to do this because it is in Israel’s interests.

“The best wayto help Israel deal with Iran’s growing nuclear capability is to help thepeople of Syria overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad,” Clintonforthrightly starts off by saying. 協助以色列處理伊朗正在增長的核子能力的最佳方法是，協助敘利亞人民推翻巴沙爾政權。

Even though all US intelligence reports hadlong dismissed Iran’s “atom bomb” program as a hoax (a conclusion supported bythe International Atomic Energy Agency), Clinton continues to use these lies to“justify” destroying Syria in the name of Israel.

She specifically links Iran’s mythical atombomb program to Syria because, she says, Iran’s “atom bomb” program threatensIsrael’s “monopoly” on nuclear weapons in the Middle East.

If Iran were to acquire a nuclear weapon,Clinton asserts, this would allow Syria (and other “adversaries of Israel” suchas Saudi Arabia and Egypt) to “go nuclear as well,” all of which would threatenIsrael’s interests.

Therefore, Clinton, says, Syria has to bedestroyed.

Iran’s nuclear program and Syria’s civilwar may seem unconnected, but they are. What Israeli military leaders reallyworry about — but cannot talk about — is losing their nuclear monopoly.

An Iranian nuclear weapons capability wouldnot only end that nuclear monopoly but could also prompt other adversaries,like Saudi Arabia and Egypt, to go nuclear as well. The result would be aprecarious nuclear balance in which Israel could not respond to provocationswith conventional military strikes on Syria and Lebanon, as it can today.

If Iran were to reach the threshold of anuclear weapons state, Tehran would find it much easier to call on its alliesin Syria and Hezbollah to strike Israel, knowing that its nuclear weapons wouldserve as a deterrent to Israel responding against Iran itself.

It is, Clinton continues, the “strategicrelationship between Iran and the regime of Bashar Assad in Syria” that makesit possible for Iran to undermine Israel’s security.

This would not come about through a “directattack,” Clinton admits, because “in the thirty years of hostility between Iranand Israel” this has never occurred, but through its alleged “proxies.”

The end of the Assad regime would end thisdangerous alliance. Israel’s leadership understands well why defeating Assad isnow in its interests.

Bringing down Assad would not only be amassive boon to Israel’s security, it would also ease Israel’s understandablefear of losing its nuclear monopoly.

Then, Israel and the United States might beable to develop a common view of when the Iranian program is so dangerous thatmilitary action could be warranted.

Clinton goes on to asset that directlythreatening Bashar Assad “and his family” with violence is the “right thing” todo:

In short, the White House can ease thetension that has developed with Israel over Iran by doing the right thing inSyria.

With his life and his family at risk, onlythe threat or use of force will change the Syrian dictator Bashar Assad’s mind.

The email proves—as if any more proof wasneeded—that the US government has been the main sponsor of the growth ofterrorism in the Middle East, and all in order to “protect” Israel.

It is also a sobering thought to considerthat the “refugee” crisis which currently threatens to destroy Europe, wasdirectly sparked off by this US government action as well, insofar as there areany genuine refugees fleeing the civil war in Syria.

In addition, over 250,000 people have beenkilled in the Syrian conflict, which has spread to Iraq—all thanks to Clintonand the Obama administration backing the “rebels” and stoking the fires of warin Syria.

The real and disturbing possibility that apsychopath like Clinton—whose policy has inflicted death and misery uponmillions of people—could become the next president of America is the mostdeeply shocking thought of all.

Clinton’s public assertion that, if electedpresident, she would “take the relationship with Israel to the next level,”would definitively mark her, and Israel, as the enemy of not just some Arabstates in the Middle East, but of all peace-loving people on earth.