時政擂台

跳至

首頁
1

尾頁
   0


男爵府

積分: 8014


1#
發表於 16-3-23 21:09 |只看該作者

http://news.china.com/international/1000/20160323/22272918.html

原文(英文)https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2016/03/21/a-transcript-of-donald-trumps-meeting-with-the-washington-post-editorial-board/?tid=pm_opinions_pop_b

看過特朗普的外交政策,大致明白他所想,亦開始明白為何有人支持他,他就是一個很本土的政客,他認為美國政府將錢花在中東,花了許多許多錢,國家卻沒有甚麼得益,美國的城市沒有錢建學校,卻在伊拉克建學校,然後被炸掉,然後又再建。美國花巨錢在保護烏克蘭、南韓、中東,美國債台高築,沒有錢為美國人改善生活。他認為其他國家應該分擔更多駐軍款項,不是50%,而是100%的軍費。他認為美國自己的建設比其他國家,例如卡塔爾、南韓落後,為何要為它們花鉅額軍費?

特朗普回應“若中國佔領釣魚島,美國咋辦?”

【環球時報綜合報導】在21日的採訪中,《華盛頓郵報》連珠炮般圍繞南海問題追問特朗普:你怎麼看中國和南海,你認為他們要做什麼?我們應怎麼做?你認為利用貿易施壓,他們會在南海退卻嗎?特朗普回答稱,“不認為美國會為了中國的行動而開啟第三次世界大戰”,他聲稱自己“非常瞭解中國”,“跟中國做了一些很棒的生意”,並且美國對中國有貿易影響力,以此施壓中國會做出讓步。特朗普拒絕說明他會對中國採取什麼舉措,“我們必須讓人捉摸不透”。在回答“如果中國佔領日本人所說的尖閣列島(即釣魚島),美國要做什麼”時,特朗普稱“我不喜歡告訴你我會怎麼做”。


特朗普在採訪中還稱,中國消耗了美國那麼多錢,用那些錢重建了中國。沒有我們,大家就看不到那裡的機場、道路和橋樑。相比他們在中國修建的橋樑,紐約的華盛頓橋簡直就是小兒科。我們不再建設了。我們的鼎盛日子已成過去。看看中國所發生的,他們下降到7%8%,就像是一場國家災難一樣。而我們的GDP增長現在本質上就是零。

《華盛頓郵報》稱,特朗普在採訪中質疑美國大規模軍事投資于亞洲的意義。特朗普還說,“韓國是一個富裕的、巨大的工業化國家……我們總是派出軍艦、飛機,搞軍事演習——我們花了很多,得到的回報很少。”韓國《東亞日報》22日稱,特朗普再次提及韓國安保“免費搭車論”,有人擔憂,隨著特朗普成為共和黨總統候選人的可能性越來越大,未來這種認識有可能反映到美國的朝鮮半島政策上。韓聯社反擊說,首爾一直分擔美國駐軍的費用。2014年美韓簽署協定,首爾答應支付9200億韓元(8.86億美元)的費用,而美國在朝鮮半島的軍事存在是符合美國國家利益的。

他的立場反映出一個商人的天性而不是外交決策者的策略。”《日本時報》22日援引一名學者的話譏諷特朗普。路透社稱,特朗普將日本描述成一個“免費搭車者”,這在東京引發憂慮,美日結盟是東京數十年來安保政策的中樞。日本政府消息人士稱,日本正在急切瞭解誰將為特朗普的安全政策出謀劃策。


澳大利亞《金融評論報》22日說,特朗普想縮減美國在亞洲的軍事資源,要求盟友繳納數以億計的保護費,這是一個激進的轉變,將使得中國成為太平洋地區的主導性軍事力量,迫使澳大利亞重新考慮與美國的聯盟。澳前駐美大使比茲利稱,澳大利亞必須為美國總統大選的所有可能結果做好準備。新聞頻道

[img align=left]C:\my documents\IMG_1427_1_1_1[/img] [img align=right]C:\my documents\DSCN1156 10-04-2004_1_4_1[/img]


男爵府

積分: 8014


2#
發表於 16-3-23 21:13 |只看該作者
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2016/03/21/a-transcript-of-donald-trumps-meeting-with-the-washington-post-editorial-board/?tid=pm_opinions_pop_b

節錄 太長未能盡錄,他雖然粗鄙,但他真係一個可敬的愛美國的本土政客。

TRUMP:
I do think it’s a different world today and I don’t think we should be nation building anymore. I think it’s proven not to work. And we have a different country than we did then. You know we have 19 trillion dollars in debt. We’re sitting probably on a bubble and, you know, it’s a bubble that if it breaks is going to be very nasty. And I just think we have to rebuild our country. If you look at the infrastructure — I just landed at an airport where, not in good shape, not in good shape. If you go to Qatar and if you go to (inaudible) you see airports the likes of which you have never seen before. Dubai, different places in China. You see infrastructure, you see airports, other things, the likes of which you have never seen here.

HIATT:
Short of nation building, is there any role in promoting values or democracy? Or that’s not something…

TRUMP:
Well, there is, I just think that we have values in our country that we have to promote. We have a country that is in bad shape, it’s in bad condition. You look at our inner cities, our inner cities are a horrible mess. I watched Baltimore, I have many, many friends in Baltimore, we watched what happened. St. Louis, Ferguson, Oakland, it could have been much worse over the summer. And it will probably be worse this summer. But you look at some of our inner cities. And yet you know I watched as we built schools in Iraq and they’d be blown up. And we’d build another one and it would get blown up. And we would rebuild it three times. And yet we can’t build a school in Brooklyn. We have no money for education, because we can’t build in our own country. And at what point do you say hey, we have to take care of ourselves. So, you know, I know the outer world exists and I’ll be very cognizant of that but at the same time, our country is disintegrating, large sections of it, especially in the inner cities.

HIATT:
So what would you do for Baltimore, let’s say.

TRUMP:
Well, number one, I’d create economic zones. I’d create incentives for companies to move in. I’d work on spirit because the spirit is so low, it’s incredible, the unemployment, you look at unemployment for black youth in this country, African American youth, is 58-59 percent. It’s unthinkable. Unemployment for African Americans – not youth, but African Americans – is very high. And I would create in the inner cities, which is what I really do best, that’s why when I open a building and I show you it’s way ahead of schedule, under budget and everything else—I think it was the Rite Aid store, the store in Baltimore it took them 20 years to get it built, one store, and then it burned down in one night—we have to create incentives for people to love what they are doing, and to make money. And to create, you know, to really create a better life for themselves. And you can’t – it doesn’t seem right that you will have a situation like Baltimore, and many other places, let’s use Baltimore as an example, there are many Baltimores in this country. Detroit is maybe even a better example than Baltimore. But that you’ll have a situation like that, and then we’re over nation building with other, with countries that in many cases don’t want us there. They want our money, but they don’t want us.


TRUMP:
Look, I see NATO as a good thing to have – I look at the Ukraine situation and I say, so Ukraine is a country that affects us far less than it affects other countries in NATO, and yet we are doing all of the lifting, they’re not doing anything. And I say, why is it that Germany is not dealing with NATO on Ukraine? Why is it that other countries that are in the vicinity of the Ukraine not dealing with — why are we always the one that’s leading, potentially the third world war, okay, with Russia? Why are we always the ones that are doing it? And I think the concept of NATO is good, but I do think the United States has to have some help. We are not helped. I’ll give you a better example than that. I mean, we pay billions– hundreds of billions of dollars to supporting other countries that are in theory wealthier than we are.

DIEHL: Hundreds of billions?

TRUMP:
Billions. Well if you look at Germany, if you look at Saudi Arabia, if you look at Japan, if you look at South Korea — I mean we spend billions of dollars on Saudi Arabia, and they have nothing but money. And I say, why? Now I would go in and I would structure a much different deal with them, and it would be a much better deal. When you look at the kind of money that our country is losing, we can’t afford to do this. Certainly we can’t afford to do it anymore.

DIEHL:
About Ukraine, was it right for the United States to impose sanctions on Russia when they invaded Crimea and would you keep those sanctions on them?

TRUMP:
I think the answer is yes, it was, but I don’t see other people doing much about it. I see us doing things about it, but I don’t see other people doing much about it.


DIEHL: What about China and the South China Sea. What do you think they’re up to and—

TRUMP: I think it’s a terrible situation, I think it’s terrible they have no respect for–

DIEHL: –and what should we do about it?

TRUMP: Well look, we have power over China and people don’t realize it. We have trade power over China. I don’t think we are going to start World War III over what they did, it affects other countries certainly a lot more than it affects us. But—and honestly, you know part of—I always say we have to be unpredictable. We’re totally predictable. And predictable is bad. Sitting at a meeting like this and explaining my views and if I do become president, I have these views that are down for the other side to look at, you know. I hate being so open. I hate when they say — like I said get rid of the oil, keep the oil, different things over the years, when people are saying what would you do with regard to the Middle East, when we left — We should have never been in Iraq. It was a horr- it was one of the worst decisions ever made in the history of our country. We then got out badly, then after we got out, I said, “Keep the oil. If we don’t keep it Iran’s going to get it.” And it turns out Iran and ISIS basically—

[img align=left]C:\my documents\IMG_1427_1_1_1[/img] [img align=right]C:\my documents\DSCN1156 10-04-2004_1_4_1[/img]


男爵府

積分: 7295


3#
發表於 16-3-23 22:05 |只看該作者

回覆:特朗普,一個真正的愛國本土政客




子爵府

積分: 10386


4#
發表於 16-3-23 22:13 |只看該作者
聽說,希拉里背後勢力龐大,就算他真的當選,他勢必被暗殺,


男爵府

積分: 8014


5#
發表於 16-3-23 23:42 |只看該作者

回覆:特朗普,一個真正的愛國本土政客

我覺得特朗普當選後會減少海外駐軍,避免介入軍事衝突,為政府省錢,而且會專注發展美国本土事務和經濟。

這個較和平的政策方向对世界各国都好。

美国政府一直販賣戰爭恐懼,不斷誇大俄羅斯和中国的威脅。是的,中国和俄羅斯的武器水平已追近美国,會威脅美軍的一哥地位,影响美国地区利益。但中国和俄羅斯卻对美国本土安全威脅不大,因為一旦爆發核战,只會兩敗俱傷,看不到中俄有任何意欲跟美国打核战。

倒是見到美国不斷拉攏其他国家佈置基地和導彈,圍堵中俄,迫使中俄作出軍事反應,但我相信美国也不打算發動核战,也無意跟中俄打仗(要打的話已在烏克蘭打了),那麼誇大中俄威脅似乎就只是為了銷售軍火和增加軍費而已。

[img align=left]C:\my documents\IMG_1427_1_1_1[/img] [img align=right]C:\my documents\DSCN1156 10-04-2004_1_4_1[/img]


禁止訪問

積分: 15556


6#
發表於 16-3-23 23:58 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


禁止訪問

積分: 15556


7#
發表於 16-3-23 23:59 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


男爵府

積分: 8014


8#
發表於 16-3-24 01:04 |只看該作者

引用:不過俄國卻充滿野心呢。

原帖由 沙崙玫瑰 於 16-03-23 發表
不過俄國卻充滿野心呢。
何以見得?

我個人認為如果不是美国協助推翻親俄的烏克蘭政府,準備讓烏克蘭加入北约,令俄羅斯感到安全受威脅,相信俄羅斯不會出兵。

假設俄羅斯在加拿大或麥西哥部署導彈,相信美軍也會揮軍直進。當年古巴危机幾乎打核战就知。

[img align=left]C:\my documents\IMG_1427_1_1_1[/img] [img align=right]C:\my documents\DSCN1156 10-04-2004_1_4_1[/img]


禁止訪問

積分: 15556


9#
發表於 16-3-25 00:40 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


子爵府

積分: 14900


10#
發表於 16-3-26 20:57 |只看該作者
我覺得特朗普會被自殺..

首頁
1

尾頁

跳至
Presslogic Logo
Baby Kingdom Logo