時政擂台今日: 0|主題: 60253

收藏本版

發帖

返回列表

跳至頁

查看: 4299 | 回覆: 3

人類學教授指出美國如何利用“國家安全”來打壓中國 [複製鏈接]

普京大帝

大宅

積分: 3108

1^#

發表於 21-7-19 01:44 |只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |打印

先發中文譯本，後面再附上英文原文。

* Dennis Etler博士基本上寫下了您對美國/中國的所有思考*

By - Dennis Etler博士，
UC伯克利人類學教授8•7•2020

“正如我所看到的那樣：當美國侵犯和占用其他國家時，殺害和傷害數百萬次追求其”國家安全“。看來美國可以用有罪不罰現象。

但是，當中國在其自己的領土中調用國家安全，在其自己的領土內撤出外國的叛亂，因此禁止並施加製裁。

當美國禁止中國應用和社交媒體時，它以國家安全的名義完成。當中國禁止美國社交媒體保護其國家安全時，它侵犯了自由和自由市場准入。
(待續)

0 0 0

私人傳訊

普京大帝

大宅

積分: 3108

2^#

發表於 21-7-19 01:45 |只看該作者

普京大帝發表於 21-7-19 01:44
先發中文譯本，後面再附上英文原文。

* Dennis Etler博士基本上寫下了您對美國/中國的所有思考*

當美國監獄的審議議案，如切爾西曼寧，這是以國家安全的名義所做的。當中國拘留持不同訴訟時，它違反了人權。

當美國壓迫其少數民族時，它被原諒是在幾個世紀的忽視後需要解決的缺陷。受壓迫者的任何阻力被視為對國家安全的威脅。當中國尋求緩解少數群體的貧困時，它被稱為種族滅絕。

當美國在其戰爭預算上花費數百億美元時，它以國家安全的名義完成。當中國建立國防軍時，它被稱為攻擊性。

似乎美國可以在自己的國家安全的名義上看，但是中國沒有權利這樣做。

- Dennis Etler博士，
UC伯克利人類學教授8•7•2020

下面是英文原文

私人傳訊

普京大帝

大宅

積分: 3108

3^#

發表於 21-7-19 01:46 |只看該作者

普京大帝發表於 21-7-19 01:45
當美國監獄的審議議案，如切爾西曼寧，這是以國家安全的名義所做的。當中國拘留持不同訴訟時，它違反了人 ...

*Dr Dennis Etler basically wrote down all your thoughts on US/China*

By - Dr Dennis Etler,
Professor of Anthropology, UC Berkeley 8•7•2020

‘As I See It: When the US invades and occupies other nations, killing and wounding millions it's always done in pursuit of its "national security." It seems the US can do so with impunity.

But when China invokes national security to quell foreign supported insurrection in its own territory it is censured and sanctions are imposed.

When the US bans Chinese apps and social media it is done in the name of national security. When China bans US social media to protect its national security it's an infringement of freedom and free market access.
(待續)

私人傳訊

普京大帝

大宅

積分: 3108

4^#

發表於 21-7-19 01:51 |只看該作者

普京大帝發表於 21-7-19 01:46
*Dr Dennis Etler basically wrote down all your thoughts on US/China*

By - Dr Dennis Etler,

When the US jails dissidents like Chelsea Manning it's done in the name of national security. When China detains a dissident it's a violation of human rights.

When the US oppresses its minorities it's excused as a flaw that needs to be addressed after centuries of neglect. Any resistance by the oppressed is seen as a threat to national security. When China seeks to alleviate the poverty of its minorities it is called genocide.

When the US spends hundreds of billions of dollars on its war budget it's done in the name of national security. When China builds up its defense forces it's called aggressive.

It seems that the US can do as it pleases in the name of it's own national security but China has no right to do the same.’

- Dr Dennis Etler,
Professor of Anthropology, UC Berkeley

附件: 你需要登錄才可以下載或查看附件。沒有帳號？註冊