論盡家傭

跳至

首頁
1

尾頁
   0


大宅

積分: 3041


1#
發表於 06-10-13 10:11 |只看該作者

"急" 新請工人到港 - 驗身大肚,可以點做.

工人請假話妹妹結婚回phillipan.
但回港要求佢驗身,醫生話佢大肚.
問佢未結婚點解會大肚.
原來吾係佢妹妹結婚,而係佢自己結婚.

可以點做.


男爵府

積分: 7610

畀面勳章


2#
發表於 06-10-13 10:23 |只看該作者

Re: "急" 新請工人到港 - 驗身大肚,可以點做.

由多一個可憐顧主 :-( :-(


別墅

積分: 562


3#
發表於 06-10-14 21:38 |只看該作者

Re: "急" 新請工人到港 - 驗身大肚,可以點做.

搵吓AGENT睇吓有無”計”傾,祝您好運!


WindyTan 寫道:
工人請假話妹妹結婚回phillipan.
但回港要求佢驗身,醫生話佢大肚.
問佢未結婚點解會大肚.
原來吾係佢妹妹結婚,而係佢自己結婚.

可以點做.


珊瑚宮

積分: 113477

好媽媽勳章


4#
發表於 06-10-14 22:05 |只看該作者

Re: "急" 新請工人到港 - 驗身大肚,可以點做.

賤格工人咁都講大話


複式洋房

積分: 400


5#
發表於 06-10-14 22:05 |只看該作者

Re: "急" 新請工人到港 - 驗身大肚,可以點做.

[size=x-large]佢咁樣有心呃你,都係lai死唔走果隻,可憐!!!通常都無計,香港法例唔幫僱主架,係星加坡同台灣,即刻but佢走啦,講落都係香港政府衰衰衰衰衰衰衰衰衰衰衰衰


珍珠宮

積分: 36216

2026勳章 2023年兔年勳章 畀面勳章 DHA勳章


6#
發表於 06-10-14 22:18 |只看該作者

Re: "急" 新請工人到港 - 驗身大肚,可以點做.

預備比佢放前4後6啦,佢咁衰但都無辦法,香港法例只係幫工人
WindyTan 寫道:
工人請假話妹妹結婚回phillipan.
但回港要求佢驗身,醫生話佢大肚.
問佢未結婚點解會大肚.
原來吾係佢妹妹結婚,而係佢自己結婚.

可以點做.
主 賜 平 安


別墅

積分: 680


7#
發表於 06-10-14 23:37 |只看該作者

Re: "急" 新請工人到港 - 驗身大肚,可以點做.

no pay leave gar,


複式洋房

積分: 441


8#
發表於 06-10-15 00:16 |只看該作者

Re: "急" 新請工人到港 - 驗身大肚,可以點做.

周大嫂 寫道:
no pay leave gar,


Sorry, there is no such thing under our Employment Ordinance You have to take care of her rather she takes care you!

Section 15AA(1) of the Employment Ordinance provides that a pregnant employee may, on producing a medical certificate with an opinion as to her unfitness to handle heavy materials, or to work in places where gas injurious to pregnancy is generated, or to do other work injurious to pregnancy, request her employer to refrain from giving her such work during her pregnancy period.

Upon your rececipt of such a certificate, you cannot assign the specififed work to her, and if she is already doing the work, you should no logner require her to do the work.




別墅

積分: 680


9#
發表於 06-10-15 08:02 |只看該作者

Re: "急" 新請工人到港 - 驗身大肚,可以點做.

我意思係工人未做滿40週, 係有權唔俾有薪假, 可以兇佢因為佢唔係香港人, 住院好貴


水晶宮

積分: 68008


10#
發表於 06-10-15 09:02 |只看該作者

Re: "急" 新請工人到港 - 驗身大肚,可以點做.

UPDATE!!
會通知傳媒,但唔知佢地黎唔黎呀)))
有更衣室可餵人奶,好乾淨,有椅,有鏡,有清潔地方.有相睇>>CLICK HERE

希望大定踴躍支持出席及叫多些朋友出席這次的質詢會.謝謝!!

地點: 荔景社區會堂--離地鐵站只係幾分鐘
日期:2006-10-15
時間: 下午2:30
可容納人數:400人
有更衣室可餵人奶,好乾淨,有椅,有鏡,有清潔地方.


複式洋房

積分: 441


11#
發表於 06-10-15 12:52 |只看該作者

Re: "急" 新請工人到港 - 驗身大肚,可以點做.

周大嫂 寫道:
我意思係工人未做滿40週, 係有權唔俾有薪假, 可以兇佢因為佢唔係香港人, 住院好貴


A female employee is entitled to maternity leave under a CONTINUOUS CONTRACT of employment with her employer immediately before she is to take her maternity leave.

The definition of 'continuous contract' for this purpose is if the employee has already been working for the employer for 10 weeks immediately before she is to take her maternity leave by reference to the expected date of confinement, she is regarded as has been working under a 'continuous contract' and entitled to maternity leave under the Employment Ordinance (see Section 12 and Section 12AA).

Although the Ordinance does not touch on the issue of medical expenses incurred in connection with pregnancy of female employee, I believe most of us are contractually bound to pay for domestic helper's medical expenses. It may be arguable that such expenses are not 'medical expenses' expected or under consideration of the parties at the time we entered into contract of employment with the domestic helper, and thus should be excluded.

Whether or not such an argument will be successful is yet to be seen. However, I don't think any sensible employer (I am referring to the ordinary poor people like myself) will take the trouble and expenses to appeal to the High Court on this issue, in case s/he loses the argument in the Labour Tribunal.

You will be fighting your case against an opponent with unlimited financial resources (as your domestic helper will definitely be entitled to have legal aid to her assistance). Notwithstanding you may be a rich employer, I don't believe you are as rich as the Legal Aid Department!

I agree it is extremely unfair to us, and the relevant provisions in the Ordinance totally defeat our purpose of retaining a domestic helper, but what can we do?


別墅

積分: 680


12#
發表於 06-10-15 16:25 |只看該作者

Re: "急" 新請工人到港 - 驗身大肚,可以點做.

This is not the new topic which for BK mami discussed here.

I don't think you should read Employment Ordinance (see Section 12 and Section 12AA). I wonder it apply to all female empolyee in Hong Kong. I think you should check http://www.labour.gov.hk/public/pdf/wcp/FDHguide.pdf , it is clearly shown in P.17, you should give the paid maternity leave to the FDH(foreign domestic helper) if she/he work for you 40 weeks before take the maternity leave. If not, she/he does not have right to ask for.

It is reconfirmed by agent. Don't interrupt the contract by yourself, you should consult labour department or your agent if you have any question.

There is still some BK mami give some valuable comments for this topic, you can read it through below link.


http://www.baby-kingdom.com/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=756346&forum=16&60

Moreover, the so-called "sensible" employer who are willing to pay for the medical expense because they do not fight for their right to the end, it is not related to "sensible" or "non-sensible" but "rich" or "not rich". Some employer would like to pay for the medical leave, it does not mean they are "sensible".

LLT 寫道:
[quote]
周大嫂 寫道:
我意思係工人未做滿40週, 係有權唔俾有薪假, 可以兇佢因為佢唔係香港人, 住院好貴


A female employee is entitled to maternity leave under a CONTINUOUS CONTRACT of employment with her employer immediately before she is to take her maternity leave.

The definition of 'continuous contract' for this purpose is if the employee has already been working for the employer for 10 weeks immediately before she is to take her maternity leave by reference to the expected date of confinement, she is regarded as has been working under a 'continuous contract' and entitled to maternity leave under the Employment Ordinance (see Section 12 and Section 12AA).

Although the Ordinance does not touch on the issue of medical expenses incurred in connection with pregnancy of female employee, I believe most of us are contractually bound to pay for domestic helper's medical expenses. It may be arguable that such expenses are not 'medical expenses' expected or under consideration of the parties at the time we entered into contract of employment with the domestic helper, and thus should be excluded.

Whether or not such an argument will be successful is yet to be seen. However, I don't think any sensible employer (I am referring to the ordinary poor people like myself) will take the trouble and expenses to appeal to the High Court on this issue, in case s/he loses the argument in the Labour Tribunal.

You will be fighting your case against an opponent with unlimited financial resources (as your domestic helper will definitely be entitled to have legal aid to her assistance). Notwithstanding you may be a rich employer, I don't believe you are as rich as the Legal Aid Department!

I agree it is extremely unfair to us, and the relevant provisions in the Ordinance totally defeat our purpose of retaining a domestic helper, but what can we do?

[/quote]


複式洋房

積分: 441


13#
發表於 06-10-15 18:44 |只看該作者

Re: "急" 新請工人到港 - 驗身大肚,可以點做.

周大嫂 寫道:

I don't think you should read Employment Ordinance (see Section 12 and Section 12AA). I wonder it apply to all female empolyee in Hong Kong.


No, sections 12 and 12AA also applies to all female employees in Hong Kong as it does apply to foreign domestic helpers.

Section 14(2) of the Employment Ordinance provides that an employer shall be required to pay a female employee maternity leave pay for the period of maternity leave taken by her and to which she is entitled under section 12(2)(a) if the employee, among other things, has been employed by that employer under a continuous contract for a period of not less than 40 weeks immediately before the date of her commencement of maternity leave as determined under section 12AA. The authority you mentioned about the '40 weeks' comes from section 14(2) of the Employment Ordinance.

So, in Windy Tan's case, whether or not she has to give maternity pay depends on when her maid started employment with her vis-a-vis the scheduled date of commencement of maternity leave. As according to her, her maid is not one newly employed but just returned to Philippine on holiday on the excuse of attending her sister's wedding.

On the issue of sensible or non-sensible to pay her medical expenses, what I mean is if I were held liable by the Labour Tribunal to pay the maid's medical expenses, I would choose to pay rather than making appeal to the High Court.

The amount for delivery of a baby in private hospital ranged only from 27k to 37k in a normal case. But in case I choose to appeal but fail, the amount of legal fees (excluding the legal fees I shall incur for myself) that I have to compensate the Legal Aid Department will definitely be double or even trible to the amoutn of medical fees. This is merely based on commercial decision




大宅

積分: 3041


14#
發表於 06-10-19 10:13 |只看該作者

Re: "急" 新請工人到港 - 驗身大肚,可以點做.

多謝各位意見.
佢係新請回來,而且係冇經agent.

已講好.保機票佢走.因為佢知係佢自己講大話.

今次係好彩.


別墅

積分: 543


15#
發表於 06-10-19 10:21 |只看該作者

Re: "急" 新請工人到港 - 驗身大肚,可以點做.

記住佢要比封辭職信你,佢寫的,唔係會lai 野

WindyTan 寫道:
多謝各位意見.
佢係新請回來,而且係冇經agent.

已講好.保機票佢走.因為佢知係佢自己講大話.

今次係好彩.

首頁
1

尾頁

跳至
Presslogic Logo
Baby Kingdom Logo