原文章由 conniechan1975 於 07-11-27 09:44 AM 發表
thanks a lot
i want to know. base on LONG LASTING. is plasma or LCD is better? e.g. repair, damage, etc.. i notice plasma price is cheaper then LCD...
原文章由 conniechan1975 於 07-11-27 10:38 AM 發表
also. sony lcd seem the most expensive. is it the best? how about philips, samsung, sharp, toshiba, LG, prima, shinco LCD? pls comments. base on long lasting, repair cost.... thanks
) 原文章由 conniechan1975 於 07-11-29 01:19 PM 發表
wah. u r so expertise. hahhaha. thanks for your explanation. i am thinking to buy a 52 inches LCD tv now. but i may wait in 2008 to see any build in tunner box for 高清.
base on long lasting, do u think sony lcd is the best? coz i wont buy a tv so often. i can use a tv more then 10 years or 20 years if there is no damage
原文章由 kc1016 於 07-11-29 03:00 發表
淨係 s . o . n . y 呢 4 個英文字都幾K啦 ... XD
Philips 畫質唔錯 ... de-interalce (其中一樣功能係除狗牙) 做得好唔錯 ... 亦保持歐系機畫面o既柔麗 ... 正 ... 缺點係比較貴 ... :-(
Sharp 就主要贏o係 panel 表面優秀 ... 黑色表現沉實 .. 相對會令立體感同對比觀感加強 ... 缺點係 de-interlace 效能一般, ... 常見狗牙 ... 高階 model 上呢個問題就細好多, 都做得幾好 (當然我呢o的前行業份子先會 "聞" 電視o既畫質 ... 其實放o係屋企, 人坐o係梳化都幾難見到狗牙 ... XD)
...