興趣嗜好 今日: 3 | 主題: 124197

積分: 103

21^#

發表於 08-5-14 22:34 |只看該作者

let have a look on 24-105is@28mm vs the sharpness wide angle of nikon ais28mmf2.8 use on 5D!
http://www.dchome.net/viewthread.php?tid=480167&highlight=%2Bkenneth.ho18

原文章由 KnN 於 08-5-14 22:25 發表

AI-S 35mm f/1.4咁都摞黎比????
咁我諗我地溝通唔到喇，ching 你岩晒～真係怕左你

私人傳訊

積分: 103

22^#

發表於 08-5-14 22:36 |只看該作者

no need to use this two to compare ge,just KnN said nikon no this range......but anyway,just want to mention that for FF lens,it is canon a bit better la

原文章由 軍魁星 於 08-5-14 22:29 發表

嘩! 呢兩支出果陣我都未出世wor. 呢兩支無AF, 無測光, 而家都停產左啦.

私人傳訊

KnN

積分: 11973

好媽媽勳章

23^#

發表於 08-5-14 22:37 |只看該作者

原文章由 kenneth.ho18 於 08-5-14 10:34 PM 發表
let have a look on 24-105is@28mm vs the sharpness wide angle of nikon ais28mmf2.8 use on 5D!
http://www.dchome.net/viewthread.php?tid=480167&highlight=%2Bkenneth.ho18

請問你比較既point 係邊?
dchome都無人so 你喇

私人傳訊

積分: 103

24^#

發表於 08-5-14 22:38 |只看該作者

and which lens you suggest for compare with similar range?

原文章由 軍魁星 於 08-5-14 22:25 發表

呢d鏡價錢好唔同故wor. n 24-85, and n24-120vr 每支三千幾, Canon 24-105 幾錢呢? 6千幾wor.

私人傳訊

KnN

積分: 11973

好媽媽勳章

25^#

發表於 08-5-14 22:39 |只看該作者

原文章由 kenneth.ho18 於 08-5-14 10:36 PM 發表
no need to use this two to compare ge,just KnN said nikon no this range......but anyway,just want to mention that for FF lens,it is canon a bit better la

唔好會錯意, 我無話過無呢個range, 只係正常黎講, 我真係無諗過摞9千幾既af鏡黎比一枝2千幾既手動鏡, just sounds stupid and doesn't make any sense.

私人傳訊

積分: 103

26^#

發表於 08-5-14 22:40 |只看該作者

the point is nikon need to catch up to develop new lens for FF dslr law!just that simple~~~

原文章由 KnN 於 08-5-14 22:37 發表

請問你比較既point 係邊?
dchome都無人so 你喇

私人傳訊

積分: 103

27^#

發表於 08-5-14 22:43 |只看該作者

same range,same aperture.....why not compare?have any other better choice for compare?actually just a discussion only.taking nice photo with kids is more important thing we need to do

原文章由 KnN 於 08-5-14 22:39 發表

唔好會錯意, 我無話過無呢個range, 只係正常黎講, 我真係無諗過摞9千幾既af鏡黎比一枝2千幾既手動鏡, just sounds stupid and doesn't make any sense.

私人傳訊

積分: 13356

28^#

發表於 08-5-14 22:48 |只看該作者

原文章由 kenneth.ho18 於 08-5-14 22:38 發表
and which lens you suggest for compare with similar range?

我對 Canon 唔熟, 我唔知應該用乜鏡對比. 不如send 個email俾Nikon, 另一個send俾Canon, 叫佢地約個地方出來決鬥定輸贏啦. 不過我比較忙, 唔得閒觀戰, 對邊個輸邊個醒亦唔多感興趣. :lol

私人傳訊

積分: 103

29^#

發表於 08-5-14 22:49 |只看該作者

ais35f1.4 still under production ah

原文章由 軍魁星 於 08-5-14 22:29 發表

嘩! 呢兩支出果陣我都未出世wor. 呢兩支無AF, 無測光, 而家都停產左啦.

私人傳訊

積分: 103

30^#

發表於 08-5-14 22:52 |只看該作者

I hope nikon to replace their old lens faster la,nikon body controlability is better than canon a lot~~~

原文章由 軍魁星 於 08-5-14 22:48 發表

我對 Canon 唔熟, 我唔知應該用乜鏡對比. 不如send 個email俾Nikon, 另一個send俾Canon, 叫佢地約個地方出來決鬥定輸贏啦. 不過我比較忙, 唔得閒觀戰, 對邊個輸邊個醒亦唔多感興趣. :lol ...

私人傳訊

積分: 13356

31^#

發表於 08-5-14 22:53 |只看該作者

原文章由 kenneth.ho18 於 08-5-14 22:40 發表
the point is nikon need to catch up to develop new lens for FF dslr law!just that simple~~~

Nikon 都係市場中的一間公司, 目的係為左賺錢, 而家日日斷貨, 佢唔洗develop new lens to catch up 都賺大錢啦.

如果你真係想Nikon發奮d, 你應該去dchome, nikon 版度呼籲下, 叫大家一齊罷買Nikon, 如果大家真係罷買既, 咁Nikon就會唸唸有乜問題喇.

私人傳訊

KnN

積分: 11973

好媽媽勳章

32^#

發表於 08-5-14 22:53 |只看該作者

原文章由 kenneth.ho18 於 08-5-14 10:43 PM 發表
same range,same aperture.....why not compare?have any other better choice for compare?actually just a discussion only.taking nice photo with kids is more important thing we need to do

你咪即係摞張美金100蚊, 同港紙100蚊黎比law.
一對都係1個1, 2個0

咁比較就係就係無意思咁解尖嗎.. 呢3枝L, 我認為nikon無鏡可以摞黎compare.

35/2, 85/1.8, 135, 105, 果d就點比都得.

[ 本文章最後由 KnN 於 08-5-14 22:56 編輯 ]

私人傳訊

積分: 13356

33^#

發表於 08-5-14 22:57 |只看該作者

原文章由 kenneth.ho18 於 08-5-14 22:52 發表
I hope nikon to replace their old lens faster la,nikon body controlability is better than canon a lot~~~

其實 Nikon d 鏡都叫做跟得足個body喇, 舊既FF鏡有大三元. 新的 Nano 鏡有 14-24, 24-70. 再加上舊鏡LB5 and 200-400, 基本上足夠你由 14-400mm呢個常用range, 你仲想Nikon出邊支?

私人傳訊

積分: 103

34^#

發表於 08-5-14 23:01 |只看該作者

prime lens.....for me,zoom is for convinient only.have IS/VR is important and no need to have big aperture~~~and this is just my need,not represent others people feeling

原文章由 軍魁星 於 08-5-14 22:57 發表

其實 Nikon d 鏡都叫做跟得足個body喇, 舊既FF鏡有大三元. 新的 Nano 鏡有 14-24, 24-70. 再加上舊鏡LB5 and 200-400, 基本上足夠你由 14-400mm呢個常用range, 你仲想Nikon出邊支? ...

私人傳訊

積分: 13356

35^#

發表於 08-5-14 23:09 |只看該作者

原文章由 kenneth.ho18 於 08-5-14 23:01 發表
prime lens.....for me,zoom is for convinient only.have IS/VR is important and no need to have big aperture~~~and this is just my need,not represent others people feeling

我就鍾意大光圈多過 VR/IS.

私人傳訊

matau

大宅

積分: 2122

36^#

發表於 08-5-14 23:09 |只看該作者

點解講講吓機會變咗講鏡？有最好嘅鏡又唔一定會影到最好嘅相，最重要係用合識嘅鏡影合識嘅相。Canon 100-400好，但你唔會用佢去影全家福，除非你好相做運動。

機身相對鏡頭平好多，我會選擇Nikon同Canon都要有，我影鳥，我覺得Canon 100-400好，所以我會用Canon影；我行山，我覺得18-200方便我，所以我會帶Nikon。

私人傳訊

積分: 103

37^#

發表於 08-5-14 23:12 |只看該作者

this is not a good example......the point is nikon doesn't have same level lens and this is important when using FF.for using on 5D,the [email protected]-2 pq is better than 50f1.4 a lot.
BTW,i am not trying to challenge you.i am also a nikon fans'.i love nikon body controlability(e.g.:many hot key on top level body only need one button+dail while canon need 2 button+dail).let s' focus on take photo with kids from now on ok?

原文章由 KnN 於 08-5-14 22:53 發表

你咪即係摞張美金100蚊, 同港紙100蚊黎比law.
一對都係1個1, 2個0
咁比較就係就係無意思咁解尖嗎.. 呢3枝L, 我認為nikon無鏡可以摞黎compare.

35/2, 85/1.8, 135, 105, 果d就點 ...

私人傳訊