基督家庭 今日: 0|主題: 9939

"

Argument against abortion –

This first passageshows that God considers the unborn fetus a life and values it enough to demand a "life for a life"!

Exodus 21:22-23

22 “If people are fighting and hit a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely but there is no serious injury, the offender must be fined whatever the woman’s husband demands and the court allows. 23 But if there is serious injury, you are totake life for life"

If the taking of a fetus' life by accident is deserving of death, how can anyone say God doesn't hate abortion?

Your point that God does not want the child resulting from a rape is not from the bible. Here are 3 laws on immoral sexual acts - none mention a pregnancy. I don't know of any others. Judah was ready to kill Tamar when it was found out she was pregnant, but he doesn't speak for God.

But you say in the case of rape the woman was pregnant and then killed. However in 2 of the 3, the woman is guilty of fornication and killed immediately, before conception took place. They didn't have long trials back then. Remember John 8 with the woman taken in the very act of adultery and they were ready to stone her immediately? That is according to the Law of Moses. In the 3rd case, the woman was not killed. So none of these support your idea.

Deuteronomy 22:22

22 If a man is foundsleeping with another man’s wife, both the man who slept with her and the woman must die. You must purge the evil from Israel.

Key phrase - "is found"; they were to be killed immediately of course.

23 If a man happens to meet in a town a virgin pledged to be married and he sleeps with her, 24 you shall take both of them to the gate of that town and stone them to death—the young woman because she was in a town and did not scream for help, and the man because he violated another man’s wife. You must purge the evil from among you.

Key phrase - "happens"; this just happened, otherwise how would anyone know if she screamed or not? The witnesses who heard her scream would immediately speak up, right? Otherwise their testimony is weak.

25 But if out in the country a man happens to meet a young woman pledged to be married and rapes her, only the man who has done this shall die. 26 Do nothing to the woman; she has committed no sin deserving death. This case is like that of someone who attacks and murders a neighbor, 27 for the man found the young woman out in the country, and though the betrothed woman screamed, there was no one to rescueher.

Keyphrase - "only the man who has done this shall die"

我想在一般情況下大家都贊同不應墜眙。回應樓主，基督徒相信每個小孩都是神的產業，父母只是受託監管的僕人，對孩子並無擁有權；如非出於致命的原因(如孩子的出生會危及母親的生命)，一般情況下如果僕人認為自己有權決定孩子的生死，那麼就準備好迎接主人的忿怒吧。至於神最終會唔會原諒拿走孩子生命的僕人，sorry無人答到你，因為會咁樣做嘅信徒到底算唔算係「信」，旁人真係無權致啄，只有神至可以答到你。

只於養唔養得起嘅問題，都係講個信字。父母信唔信得過神既然將小孩交俾父母(就算對人黎講係意外)，就一定會有埋供應俾父母養大小孩，係信心嘅問題。如果父母唔信，咁真係旁人講一萬句都冇用，都係問神同問返父母自己喇，而且樓主講得0岩，反正最後都係父母要同神交待0者。

[因姦成孕]是一個很敏感的問題，感情上我傾向於不想讓這些孩子出生，但我知道自己並無充份聖經根據。而且我對所謂「罪中所生」的孩子會不會受神看顧這點很有疑問。我只可以肯定，犯下姦淫行為的人一定不為神所喜悅，至於孩子是否如此則不清楚，在我看來只有神能決定。而且所謂「不會幸福」的孩子是否就不應出生，到底應該由誰決定呢？我們能確定這些孩子真的全都會「幸福」或「不幸福」嗎？恐怕無論我們的答案如何，都只是從自己有限的認識範圍中得來的印象罷了。故此在這個問題上，大家爭論的似乎不是真理，而是個人意見…