JM 思路好精密。如果美國借來嘅錢買返人民幣，咁你嘅講法係成立的。
但美國近幾年根本係借錢度日，美國係全球最大嘅employer. D錢大部份用係welfare, pay back previous loans and interests, social security, 人工，contracts, defense (自以為保衛地球）美國政府每用1元，其中0.42元係借返來的。根本冇能力買人民幣。
美國政府令人民幣升值，主要係想減低貿易易差。同還小D債，冇直接關係。
原帖由 Sfc9 於 13-12-17 發表
JM 可否解釋下貨嘅meaning? US securities? 定係一舨貨物？
Us buying item from China …less they paid according to they borrow money from them n also stimulate economic since they paid lower salary n product export
原帖由 skybiebie 於 13-12-17 發表
Us buying item from China …less they paid according to they borrow money from them n also stimulate ...
JM 咁夜都未瞓？
Ok, let\'s assume that the US bought the same amount of goods from China in 2012 and 2013. If the Yaun\'s value went up in 2013, the US would have to pay more money for the same abound of goods in 2013. The Yaun\'s value has a significant impact on the global economy, but it doesn\'t half a direct impact on the US\'s debt.
My ultimate question is, when Yuan\'s value increased, does the US government pay less to China for the debt?
發表於 
返回列表
