我去睇咗法庭判決書呢,發現我難以想像嘅事情,大家都不如去睇下。原來前面嘅回覆講衣物纖維點樣精準精準呢,又話洗過幾多次會好唔一樣呢。判決書上面唔係咁寫,化驗無搵到獨特關鍵嘅證據,證明嚟自果一件西裝呢,無話有啲咩清潔劑或者洗咗幾多次或者吻合破損嘅地方呢,直情個報告寫住 not unique..........
最令我意外嘅係我以為工場畀佢清潔咗呢,無血漬無指紋,原來唔係,工場有數以萬計嘅纖維,但無一條係嚟自於嗰件黑色西裝呢。我真係唔知道兇手可以點樣做,清潔咗無指紋無血漬無自己嘅黑色西裝但有好多好多其他纖維
CACC966/1975 日期: 24/03/1976
AU-YEUNG PING KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/loadPdf.jsp?url=https://legalref.judiciary.hk/doc/judg/word/vetted/other/en/1976/CACC000528_1976.doc&mobile=N
CACC528/1976 日期: 07/08/1976
AU-YEUNG PING KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/loadPdf.jsp?url=https://legalref.judiciary.hk/doc/judg/word/vetted/other/en/1975/CACC000966_1975.doc&mobile=N