我諗private 同 public hospital 最大的分別大概是:
Private ones can have personal nurse, own space and the spouse can visit you at anytime (24 hours). Public ones 唔會比人隨時去探訪的...
我唔知nz d大肚婆多唔多政府同私家一齊睇, 不過全部都係自己決定, 有些產婦選擇全程係private, 有些選全程public,
有些好似我咁選half...有好多因素要考慮 e.g. is your house close to that particular hospital, do you want to have your own space to rest after the delivery, will you have a normal delivery (e.g. no complicated delivery...etc.),..等等..
我記得我好似照過3 次ultrasound, 因為我有流血...有關ultrasound 對bb的影響我都問過, 通常都話應該冇問題但唔會話係100%..因為so far 都冇evidence or cases 話有問題, 但佢地又話無evidence 唔等於無問題...他們都suggest 產婦, 若無需要, 就不用照...如果你去私家, 照幾多次都得...比錢就得...
但抽羊水佢地就話唔過33 或 even 35 years old 都唔建意你去照, 因為有一定既risk (e.g. bb 感染外出的virus..etc.).
... [size=large]你睇下呢d資料岩唔岩Angie 用~~
10.04.2004
By LOUISA CLEAVE
It began with a speeding fine and ended up with a New Zealand man's letter zooming around the world by email.
The South Auckland accountant's clever letter to police disputing a speeding fine has ended up in inboxes everywhere.
Justin Lee of Manurewa was let off the $120 fine after noticing irregularities in the infringement notice, handwritten by an officer at Pokeno on January 26.
The notice states that Mr Lee was driving at 116km/h in a 100km/h zone on June 23, 1974 - the date of his birth.
It gives the correct registration number but describes a differentcar.
Mr Lee wrote to police saying the date of the offence was of grave concern as he was not issued with a driver's licence until the 1990s.
"I do not have a clear recollection of very much at all before I was 3 1/2 years old, so I rang mum to see if she remembered what I was doing that day. She said that - coincidentally - I was born on that day."
Mr Lee said he emailed the documents to a group of friends who passed them on.
The email was sent to his brother in Australia during the rounds and it came to Weekend Herald staff - who had never heard of Mr Lee - via England.
"I don't mind [it going around the world] at all. A lot of people are getting some really good laughs out of it and I don't think it's derogatory ... it's not going to hurt anyone," Mr Lee said.
He told police he was born about 5pm in Porirua on the date of the alleged offence.
"For me to have travelled from Porirua to the foot of the Bombay Hills just out of Auckland by 6.30, I would had to have crawled into the first car in the hospital parking lot and headed for Auckland at around 1000km/h.
"For this reason, it is entirely possible that the constable who clocked me back in 1974 was holding his laser equipment upside down and instead of doing 116km/h as per the infringement notice, it is more likely that I was doing 911km/h."
This, writes Mr Lee, is where things start to get really strange.
"The car that I must have crawled into had the same licence plate as the one I have now. However, my car is a dark grey Nissan Bluebird SS, with dual cup holders, 1800cc of grunt, air-conditioning and electric windows.
"You will notice that a time-travel option is not included on this model, so that rules out any 'Back to the Future' issues and the car I was driving back then could not have been the one I drive today.
"This is clarified by the infringement notice, which states that the vehicle was a Honda saloon. How this relates to my Nissan Bluebird, I cannot fathom.
"So to recap, it appears that on my birthday on June 23, 1974, I crawled out of the maternity ward, hijacked a seriously high-powered Honda saloon with an automated number plate changing mechanism, drove to Auckland at close to Mach 1, was pulled over approaching the Bombay Hills and unwittingly changed the automated number plate changing mechanism to show the same number as a car I would come to own almost 30 years later (the chance of selecting the same number plate is a mere 1 in 308,915,776 - so quite conceivable)."
The police infringement bureau sent the following response to Mr Lee on March 30: "After careful consideration of your comments and the circumstances surrounding the issue of the notice, it has been decided on this occasion to waive the offence. Accordingly, you are no longer required to pay the infringement fee."