
原帖由 blackangel 於 10-6-19 11:50 發表
From what the Judge's saying, there is no meaning. I dont think the maid or those people who help the maid will expect there will be a penalty to the employer and the penalty will be given to them. ...

我唔會再嘥時間去叫你諗多啲同諗深啲, 哩啲係各人修為! 
原帖由 DoReMi媽媽 於 10-6-19 10:57 發表
對於裁判官話你以外傭盜竊即炒哩個理由, 確實令人摸不着頭腦, 我反而想問下各位sis, 有冇人曾經有咁o既經驗? 如以哩個情況, 外傭偷錢走佬, 咁警方係當2件事嚟處理? 1件係盜竊, 1件係人口失蹤? 定還是只以盜竊一項開file? 咁面對哩個情況, 我們報警時是否要將哩2樣嘢分開? 即係要報個工人失蹤, 同時再報唔見錢, 2個case, 由警方去聯想會唔會係個工人偷錢? 而家哩個情形, 會唔會個官只睇到警方報告盜竊不成立, 但隻字不提人口失蹤, 所以個官就單純認為以哩個理據即炒不成立? 希望大家能喺討論中得到頭緒, 令後來者唔駛重蹈覆轍! ..

原帖由 blackangel 於 10-6-19 12:38 發表
1. I understand your saying. But I never say any party is right or wrong but to give my fair opinions with my knowledge to all employers here without prejudice to employer or maid, whether employer ...
原帖由 FA8866 於 10-6-19 12:54 發表
哎呀!!!
我終於訓醒覺諗起一個關鍵性既問題,尋日硬係覺得有甩漏又諗唔起.
大家千祈唔好出Cash
僱主因為出左cash,agent只能証明工人每月有還$$($3,000),但無証明係出足$3,580,班物體既新招數就係 ...

