cway 寫道:
[quote]
fat 寫道:
有乜comment?
我地未必報lu!因就算考到都唔打算讀![]()
[/quote]Joshua媽 寫道:
YC 2 years old course is a very good course (much better than my expectation)... although the school fee is quite high, I'll recommend to others...
BECAUSE:
1. the ratio of teachers to kids is low (3 full time teachers + 1 part time teacher + 1 tse tse TO 23 kids)
2. they let the kids to explore many different things (even those which are dirty + difficult to tidy up... like sand/water/flour...)
3. the school headmistress always stressed on the qualifications of their teachers (their working years in YC, their academic level on early childhood education...)
4. they always keep very good connection to the parents and let them know the activities/things they do in school... (newsletter/VCD/visits/photos...)
5. they organise visits/trips (of coz very short one) for kids+paretns and workshops to parents
6. their expat teachers are all with early childhood education degree + numerous years of experience in child psy + teaching english as a second language... so like Joshua who is under her group, I find he learns new vocab everyday + can answer our questions in English meaningfully...
7. they have no books/homeworks... but amazingly, u can see your kids change alot... especially in English ...
BUT for 3 years old class, the situation is much different...![]()
![]()
so I may not choose YC for 3 years old class lor.
Joshua媽 寫道:
A colleague of mind's daughter studys there and her mum told me that Kentville's standard is really 'horrible' wor?! and this year she wants her daughter to change another kindy.,.,,![]()
![]()
Joshua媽 寫道:
A colleague of mind's daughter studys there and her mum told me that Kentville's standard is really 'horrible' wor?! and this year she wants her daughter to change another kindy.,.,,![]()
![]()