原文章由 ellawyc 於 08-8-3 00:44 發表
咁.....不如以後唔好行, 因為搞手唔會知道到底實際有幾多人黎.
大家都以為要好似7.1呢d至係noise, 咁......義工再搞落去, 都真係冇乜意義.
當然, 黎唔黎, 絕對係各位自由; 但知唔知義工放幾多心機時間落去? FA出 ...
原文章由 Jasmine-4711 於 08-8-3 00:58 發表
ellawyc:
I don't have to be so激氣/晦氣,話自已贛居. Do u know there is 遊行on this subject on 27/7 and 2/8 already? We are not doing us a favour by speading the number so thin.
By the way, I am not ...
By the way, I am not doing it for公義. I am doing it for 私利.
原文章由 Jasmine-4711 於 08-8-3 00:04 發表
I am considering whether to attend. If there are several hundreds of us it is worth it. But under 100?我怕不成氣候, the govt will not care.
原文章由 Jasmine-4711 於 08-8-3 00:58 發表
ellawyc:
I don't have to be so激氣/晦氣,話自已贛居. Do u know there is 遊行on this subjecton 27/7 and 2/8 already? We are not doing us a favour by speading thenumber so thin.
By the way, I am not doing it for公義. I am doing it for 私利.
原文章由 Jasmine-4711 於 08-8-3 10:29 發表
首先,我想多謝班義工的付出,我原意唔係話佢地.
但遊行整體的目的,的確是為僱主之私利,如果為"公義",應俾番$400俾外傭,佢地都開始爭取緊.
如與外傭工會協調好加入遊行,口徑一至人又多些會更好,否則搞一餐取消左外傭 ...
原文章由 Jasmine-4711 於 08-8-3 10:29 發表
首先,我想多謝班義工的付出,我原意唔係話佢地.
但遊行整體的目的,的確是為僱主之私利,如果為"公義",應俾番$400俾外傭,佢地都開始爭取緊.
如與外傭工會協調好加入遊行,口徑一至人又多些會更好,否則搞一餐取消左外傭 ...