論盡家傭

跳至

首頁
1

尾頁
   2


侯爵府

積分: 24793


1#
發表於 16-1-13 16:23 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 dyl 於 16-1-18 23:29 編輯

http://hongkongnews.com.hk/news/ ... yer-made-her-do-it/

--------------------

It was her employer’s idea.

A 41-year-old Filipino domestic worker avoided being imprisoned for four months after she was arrested in North Point for not living in her employer’s residence.

Shatin Magistrate Ho Chun-yiu suspended the four months jail sentence he imposed on Felomina L.B. for two years after she pleaded guilty to the charge of conspiracy to defraud Immigration officials.

This means that, if she does not commit a crime in the next two years, she would not have to serve out her jail sentence.

“I want to tell you that the offense you are facing is a very serious one….(but) in this case, the offer to stay out was made by the employer,” Judge Ho said on December 18.

“I accept that there is no evidence that you were working outside your contractual address. In other words, the damage is minimal,” the magistrate said.

“I also appreciate that you frankly told investigators about your agreement with your employer,” he added.

Felomina was arrested during a raid at around 12:56 a.m. on February 17 last year at her room in a flat along Chun Yeung Street in North Point.

A check with her contract showed that she should have been living with her employer in their flat along King’s Road, also in North Point.

The Filipino started working with her employer, surnamed Tang, on June 16, 2012. But before her contract was signed, her employer told her that she would have to sleep outside their flat.

For this reason, the employer gave her an additional $1,900 on top of her basic salary, Felomina’s lawyer told the court.

“From 12 a.m. to 9 p.m., she worked in her employer’s household. After that, she had to leave because her employer’s family needed privacy,” the lawyer said.

The domestic worker immediately told investigators about this agreement after her arrest. At first, her lawyer told the court that sleeping outside the home of her employer did not violate the clause of her contract which said she should “reside” in her employer’s house.
“Sleeping is not residing. She still spent much of her time working in her employer’s home,” the lawyer said.

However, Judge Ho pointed to the fact that the domestic worker had already admitted to sleeping outside her employer’s residence.

He added that he usually gave a “suspended sentence” to domestic workers who were told by their employer to sleep outside their home. After hearing this, Felomina decided to change her plea from “not guilty” to “guilty.”

The defendant, who has a son aged 25 and a daughter aged 23 back in the Philippines, had been working as a domestic worker in Hong Kong since 2003.

She said she was still employed by the Tangs but might now look for another employer. Her employer’s sister attended the court hearing.

Judge Ho asked if Felomina’s boss had been charged but the prosecutor said the employer was still under investigation.


子爵府

積分: 13681


2#
發表於 16-1-13 19:29 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 PonyMom 於 16-1-13 22:11 編輯



我話比姐姐聽工人外宿違法被判刑,工人非常驚訝,因為好多friend做西人或有錢人家的工人都外宿。我個姐姐仲有d憤憤不平,巨話如果工人判刑,甘個顧主也應該判刑,於是我讀了最後一段比巨聽,巨聽完非常之滿意

點評

la_source    發表於 16-1-20 15:43


侯爵府

積分: 24793


3#
發表於 16-1-13 23:07 |只看該作者
工人被拉指控番個僱主好正常,有鑊一齊揹丫嘛,如果吾係點減刑


禁止訪問

積分: 2443


4#
發表於 16-1-18 14:14 |只看該作者

回覆:‘Stay-out’ FDH avoids prison after saying her employer made her do it

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


侯爵府

積分: 24793


5#
發表於 16-1-18 15:39 |只看該作者
最好有電視廣告, 重要講埋最高監禁幾多年之類, 咁就吾可以爭論

點評

wcpcelia    發表於 16-1-20 10:41


子爵府

積分: 13681


6#
發表於 16-1-18 21:26 |只看該作者
建議樓主將標題改為中文,可能多d人click入黎,等有多d顧主知道吖


侯爵府

積分: 24793


7#
發表於 16-1-18 23:37 |只看該作者
dyl 發表於 16-1-13 16:23
http://hongkongnews.com.hk/news/ ... yer-made-her-do-it/

--------------------
而家個工人話係僱主要佢出去瞓,全部推番落僱主度,而家僱主受調查一身蟻

點評

333s    發表於 16-1-19 12:35


禁止訪問

積分: 2443


8#
發表於 16-1-20 00:24 |只看該作者

回覆:外宿菲僱傭被拉後為免入獄而反指控是僱主要求她非法外宿

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


子爵府

積分: 13681


9#
發表於 16-1-20 10:30 |只看該作者
甜心妈妈 發表於 16-1-20 00:24
我新請的工人不斷要求外宿!正在頭痛!為何這新聞未見大肆報導!?
我已經大致讀左呢單新聞比我工人聽,相信通過巨把口可以擴散比更多工人。我尤其強調左其中個官講既呢句說話:"I want to tell you that the offense you are facing is a very serious one…"


侯爵府

積分: 24793


10#
發表於 16-1-20 10:59 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 dyl 於 16-1-20 11:00 編輯
甜心妈妈 發表於 16-1-20 00:24
我新請的工人不斷要求外宿!正在頭痛!為何這新聞未見大肆報導!?呢條link

send l呢條 link 佢睇,話係非法,入境處拉到佢,你同佢都有罪,講真出左事佢梗係話你迫佢



子爵府

積分: 14097

2024年龍年勳章 秋日勳章 炎夏勳章 春季勳章 冬日勳章 畀面勳章


11#
發表於 16-1-20 12:32 |只看該作者

回覆:外宿菲僱傭被拉後為免入獄而反指控是僱主要求她非法外宿

段報導冇需要俾外傭睇,覺得係教唆緊佢地出事就推晒落僱主身上,事實双方都有犯法。


侯爵府

積分: 24793


12#
發表於 16-1-20 13:31 |只看該作者
5R2H 發表於 16-1-20 12:32
段報導冇需要俾外傭睇,覺得係教唆緊佢地出事就推晒落僱主身上,事實双方都有犯法。

...
出左事後大把工人或律師會教佢指控番個雇主. 我個 agent 話個個新到香港工人都知係非法因為 agent 會講, 工人係扮野吾知


子爵府

積分: 10867


13#
發表於 16-1-20 13:56 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 tuenmunoasia 於 16-1-20 15:29 編輯

外傭長期外宿無論是否僱主意思亦應負上最大責任,因為主導權和決定權都係僱主手上,就算係外傭要求咁做僱主都係知法犯法,如果法官問僱主姐姐日日唔係屋企瞓乜你唔知咩,僱主可以點解釋,當然姐姐亦有犯法,把責任推在對方身上人之常情。


侯爵府

積分: 24793


14#
發表於 16-1-28 14:02 |只看該作者
聽姐姐講好多 boarding house 環境好差,好多人瞓一間房, 有d重有室


禁止訪問

積分: 2443


15#
發表於 16-1-31 15:13 |只看該作者

回覆:dyl 的帖子

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


侯爵府

積分: 24793


16#
發表於 16-1-31 23:12 |只看該作者
甜心妈妈 發表於 16-1-31 15:13
Agree !宜家吵著話要一個月辭職!
因為吾比佢出去瞓而要辭職?佢係吾係揾藉口迫你?


禁止訪問

積分: 2443


17#
發表於 16-2-1 00:39 |只看該作者

回覆:dyl 的帖子

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


禁止訪問

積分: 2443


18#
發表於 16-2-1 00:48 |只看該作者

回覆:dyl 的帖子

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


侯爵府

積分: 24793


19#
發表於 16-2-1 10:58 |只看該作者
甜心妈妈 發表於 16-2-1 00:48
為了stayout,無故挑起事端!
你show 左拉左非法外宿段新聞佢睇,咁佢点講?佢好姣滑,佢而家明知犯法都迫你,到時出左事佢實推落你度, 你揾第二個啦,你屋企係唔係有多過一個工人?

首頁
1

尾頁

跳至
Presslogic Logo
Baby Kingdom Logo