夫婦情感

跳至

首頁

尾頁
   0


大宅

積分: 1482


481#
發表於 07-1-11 16:48 |只看該作者

Re: 請各位男人同女人都俾D意見俾我。。


大宅

積分: 1482


482#
發表於 07-1-11 16:53 |只看該作者

Re: 請各位男人同女人都俾D意見俾我。。


大宅

積分: 1482


483#
發表於 07-1-11 16:55 |只看該作者

Re: 請各位男人同女人都俾D意見俾我。。


大宅

積分: 1482


484#
發表於 07-1-11 17:01 |只看該作者

Re: 請各位男人同女人都俾D意見俾我。。



複式洋房

積分: 186


485#
發表於 07-1-12 00:13 |只看該作者

Re: 請各位男人同女人都俾D意見俾我。。

pccw are u there?


水晶宮

積分: 67993


486#
發表於 07-1-12 00:17 |只看該作者

Re: 請各位男人同女人都俾D意見俾我。。

HKU_LLM ,

Hi, 我係度
天空之城, 快樂之地


複式洋房

積分: 186


487#
發表於 07-1-12 00:20 |只看該作者

Re: 請各位男人同女人都俾D意見俾我。。

Looks like the matter growing bad.

Again, looks like my prediction. The story of kidnapping child.


水晶宮

積分: 67993


488#
發表於 07-1-12 00:26 |只看該作者

Re: 請各位男人同女人都俾D意見俾我。。

HKU_LLM ,

所以我覺得peg應該即刻帶仔返香港。但佢靜雞雞帶仔返香港,法律上有冇問題?
天空之城, 快樂之地


複式洋房

積分: 186


489#
發表於 07-1-12 00:37 |只看該作者

Re: 請各位男人同女人都俾D意見俾我。。

PCCW2319 寫道:
HKU_LLM ,

所以我覺得peg應該即刻帶仔返香港。但佢靜雞雞帶仔返香港,法律上有冇問題?


In theory is OK because at this moment, both of them have parental responsibility. But if Peg deliberately hide the son to HK, she may sue/petition by his C6 for divorce under the heading of unreasonable behaviour. That's a big harm to her for bidding the upbringing rights in the future.

The story I told before is真人真事.

不過我覺得而家都ng好同c6做正路野.

I suggest bringing the child to HK secretly.


水晶宮

積分: 67993


490#
發表於 07-1-12 00:44 |只看該作者

Re: 請各位男人同女人都俾D意見俾我。。

HKU_LLM ,

agree - 而家都ng好同c6做正路野. bringing the child to HK secretly.咁佢c6黎HK搵仔時咪最多俾佢見面。咁Peg唔算deliberately hide the son to HK, right ?

最多佢c6黎HK時再傾,好過係c6國家傾。
天空之城, 快樂之地


複式洋房

積分: 186


491#
發表於 07-1-12 00:44 |只看該作者

Re: 請各位男人同女人都俾D意見俾我。。

I really want to know where did they marry, HK/Indo??

It affects the application of laws.


複式洋房

積分: 186


492#
發表於 07-1-12 00:46 |只看該作者

Re: 請各位男人同女人都俾D意見俾我。。

PCCW2319 寫道:
HKU_LLM ,

agree - 而家都ng好同c6做正路野. bringing the child to HK secretly.咁佢c6黎HK搵仔時咪最多俾佢見面。咁Peg唔算deliberately hide the son to HK, right ?

最多佢c6黎HK時再傾,好過係c6國家傾。---
Also agree your point


複式洋房

積分: 186


493#
發表於 07-1-12 00:49 |只看該作者

Re: 請各位男人同女人都俾D意見俾我。。

pccw, do u think peg will log in tonight?


水晶宮

積分: 67993


494#
發表於 07-1-12 00:49 |只看該作者

Re: 請各位男人同女人都俾D意見俾我。。

我唔知。我覺得多數係Indo!佢c6你係生意人,應該係果邊大搞結婚d野。

係咪可以飛左返黎, 等香港律師同對方律師搞得架啦?
天空之城, 快樂之地


水晶宮

積分: 67993


495#
發表於 07-1-12 00:51 |只看該作者

Re: 請各位男人同女人都俾D意見俾我。。

HKU_LLM,

我諗唔會,叫佢tomorrow send e-mail比你好冇?
天空之城, 快樂之地


複式洋房

積分: 186


496#
發表於 07-1-12 00:55 |只看該作者

Re: 請各位男人同女人都俾D意見俾我。。

As far as I know, if they are married in Indo, then the litigation(court case) will be held in Indo, the participation of HK lawyer is minimal, so the chance of Indo lawyer Vs. HK lawyer is very unlikely unless the HK lawyer have the practice right in Indo but I think this is also an unlikely case. The JK lawyer will normally act for Peg to write some correspondences upon the Indo lawyer who act for Peg.

Ah, poor Peg!!


複式洋房

積分: 186


497#
發表於 07-1-12 00:57 |只看該作者

Re: 請各位男人同女人都俾D意見俾我。。

i think no need, to write here can increase the transparency of this matter, right?

But if there are certain privacy, private e mail is OK.


水晶宮

積分: 67993


498#
發表於 07-1-12 01:00 |只看該作者

Re: 請各位男人同女人都俾D意見俾我。。

由 HKU_LLM 於 2007-01-12 00:55:07
As far as I know, if they are married in Indo, then the litigation(court case) will be held in Indo, the participation of HK lawyer is minimal, so the chance of Indo lawyer Vs. HK lawyer is very unlikely unless the HK lawyer have the practice right in Indo but I think this is also an unlikely case. The JK lawyer will normally act for Peg to write some correspondences upon the Indo lawyer who act for Peg.

Ah, poor Peg!!


咁過程中,Peg's son可唔可留係HK or 佢c6有冇權要求阿仔返Indo ?
天空之城, 快樂之地


水晶宮

積分: 67993


499#
發表於 07-1-12 01:04 |只看該作者

Re: 請各位男人同女人都俾D意見俾我。。

由 HKU_LLM 於 2007-01-12 00:57:58
i think no need, to write here can increase the transparency of this matter, right?

But if there are certain privacy, private e mail is OK.


OK & Thanks - 不過我諗佢tomorrow未必上黎,因為好唔明朗,佢要即刻決定 & 搞d野
天空之城, 快樂之地


複式洋房

積分: 186


500#
發表於 07-1-12 01:05 |只看該作者

Re: 請各位男人同女人都俾D意見俾我。。

It depends on the Indo's Court.

Normally, yes, should be back to Indo, His c6's lawyer must made this request/application to Court.
Also, the kid's usual living place is Indo. It's reasonable to keep the boy there for living/educating and there was no emergency threat/harm to him. BTW, if Pef was unable to prove her case, the chance for her to win the child was not that high because best interest always links to financial background. His c6 was not violent and have a quite good background!!

首頁

尾頁

跳至
Presslogic Logo
Baby Kingdom Logo