自由講場

跳至

首頁
12

尾頁
   0


洋房

積分: 86


發表於 05-12-21 21:28 |顯示全部帖子

簽名支持釋放韓農

To: 全球公民
(please use simplified chinese to read the chinese)

全球公民抗命不是騒亂!

支援WTO的受害者及異議者! 立即釋放被補人士 !

世貿會議在香港舉行,各地民間團體也齊集,發表不同意見,豐富了香港人作為國 際公民社會一員的視野。但作為一個東道主, 香港政府並無堅持「中立」的立場, 反而不斷透過簡化粗陋,純為世貿歌功頌德的電視/報紙宣傳片, 試圖誤導市民,妨礙市民理性認識世貿組織真貌。

12月17日,香港警方也未有遵守最高度克制,及盡力協助世貿異議者充分表達意 見的原則,引發激烈肢體衝突。然而,香港政府卻刻意引導輿論,指責這些衝突為一場「騷亂」。

事實上,示威者一直都恪守爭取進入會議場地,直接跟世貿代表對話的原則,體現 公民抗命(civil disobedience)的精神,因而對員警不合理的封鎖線進行衝擊。 他們所針對的並非普通市民的生命、安全、也沒有破壞任何私有財產, 實在難以稱 為一場「騷亂」。但香港政府卻誘導媒體扭曲示威行動, 實在有損香港身為一個保障言論自由的城市。

世貿運作和決議影響萬千農民與勞工的生計,偏幫發達國家的大財團,漠視分配公 義,和對地球資源的掠奪。貧苦工農身陷絕境,決心反抗,實屬無可奈可。

我們強烈質疑:
1) 香港政府將激烈衝突定性為「騷亂」,是否只用來合理化警方在當中首先挑起 的不必要暴力 (excessive force)?
2) 事件過後,香港警方無理及無必要地長時間扣留大批外來的示威者,是否在於 控制言論自由及集會自由, 讓他們無法在世貿會議期間正常發表意見?
3) 香港警方容許持有香港身份證的人離開集會現場, 卻扣留國際示威者,是否有 針對性的持雙重標準?

我們呼籲: 
1) 香港政府與警方停止抹黑抗議世貿示威的言論和行動。
2) 立即釋放被捕示威者。
3) 向國際社會解釋其雙重標準。
4) 香港市民應繼續盡國際公民的責任,捍衛不同意見的表達權利,瞭解不同的意 見表達方式,並繼續深切認識世貿為跨國財團服務,嚴重影響發展中國家民眾利益 的醜惡一面。

發起的學者:
陸德泉 浸會大學,聯絡電話: 9527-8227 聯絡電郵: [email protected]
何芝君 理工大學
梁志遠 理工大學
潘 毅 科技大學
陳允中 科技大學
司徒薇 香港大學

….繼續聯署中

Global Civil Disobedience IS Not Rioting!
In Support of the Victims and Protestors Against WTO!
Release all the Detained Protestors Immediately!

During the WTO meeting in Hong Kong, non-government organizations from all over the world gather in Hong Kong to voice their different opinions, and in this manner, enrich Hong Kong people exposure to the international civil society. As a host of this international negotiation, the Hong Kong government should insist on its neutrality and balance in representing the events. Unfortunately, it does the opposite. It constantly supplies the broadcasting and print media with simplified propaganda solely for the purpose of glorifying the WTO, trying in the process to misinform the public and prevent the public from access to the information that would allow them to make rational and truthful understanding of the WTO and its effects.

On December 17, 2005, protestors persisted in their demand to enter the WTO meeting venue in order to directly dialogue with the WTO representatives. This is the actualization of their freedom of _expression and their spirit of civil disobedience, and in this spirit, they challenged the unreasonable blockade of the Hong Kong police. They did not endanger the life and safety of ordinary citizens, nor did they damage any private property or public facilities. Thus, their action cannot in any way be described and understood as a “riot.” The government however, misled the media in unjustly misrepresenting the protest. The government is thus responsible for taking the lead in damaging the image of Hong Kong as an international city that upholds the freedom of _expression.


The operation and decisions of the WTO affects the livelihood of millions of farmers and workers around the world. It is biased in favor of developed countries and multinational corporations while neglecting its direct adverse effects: the unjust redistribution of wealth, and the exploitation and privatization of the world’s natural resources. It is inevitable that farmers in destitution and despair need to fight back.

We strongly question:

1. The Hong Kong government’s deliberate misrepresentation of the protests as riots. Is it only in order to justify the police in its initiation of the conflicts and its excessive use of force?

2. The police’s decision to detain over 1,000 protesters for many hours up to more than 24 hours after the incident. It is absolutely unreasonable and unnecessary unless the purpose of the police is to deny the protesters their rights, and to prevent them from exercising their freedoms of _expression and demonstration during the remaining period of the WTO meetings.

3. The Hong Kong police’s decision to allow the protesters with Hong Kong identity cards to leave the site of the demonstration and detention freely, while detaining foreign protesters. Is this a deliberate use of double standards with discriminatory implications?

We demand that:

1. The Hong Kong government and the police stop negatively misrepresenting the messages and actions of the anti-WTO protesters.

2. The police release all detained protesters immediately.

3. The Hong Kong government and the police explain to the international community its use of double standards in the treatment of local and foreign protesters.

4. The Hong Kong citizens should continue to exercise their responsibility as members of the international civil society to defend everyone’s right to express different opinions, to understand and embrace people’s different forms of expressions, to learn in depth about the other face of the WTO not projected by our government, and to reflect upon the negative effects of the WTO, which is biased in service of the large corporations, and to understand how the WTO affects adversely the livelihood and rights of people’s in the developing countries.

Sincerely,

The Undersigned

http://www.petitiononline.com/nowto/petition.html


子爵府

積分: 10842


發表於 05-12-21 21:40 |顯示全部帖子

Re: 簽名支持釋放韓農

I have signed already !!


大宅

積分: 3851


發表於 05-12-21 21:47 |顯示全部帖子

Re: 簽名支持釋放韓農

goodies 寫道:
I have signed already !!

Me too


大宅

積分: 1455


發表於 05-12-21 21:56 |顯示全部帖子

Re: 簽名支持釋放韓農

我都用真姓名簽o左啦,用網名簽無人知你係乜水,我覺得用真名有誠意d,最好落埋身份証號碼,行得正企得正o既話,駛乜怕俾人知! :mrgreen:


大宅

積分: 3428


發表於 05-12-21 22:04 |顯示全部帖子

Re: 簽名支持釋放韓農

HH 寫道:
我都用真姓名簽o左啦,我覺得用真名有誠意d,
行得正企得正,怕乜俾人知! :mrgreen:


我早已用真名噃! 但封信又係太偏埋一邊. 點解唔可以兩存呢?

(後補充)早前900人時這信要求放人的內容是較合理. 因為其中大部份示威者都是和平的. 同意現在待判的14人, 有証有據, 應受香港法律制裁. 不能放.
[size=medium]
這信已有時差, 現時可以不理, 不要再拿來爭辯了.拜托各位撥火生事者!


複式洋房

積分: 461


發表於 05-12-21 23:36 |顯示全部帖子

Re: 簽名支持釋放韓農

一片歪理、胡言。


珊瑚宮

積分: 122359


發表於 05-12-21 23:45 |顯示全部帖子

Re: 簽名支持釋放韓農

如果有足夠證據都唔作出檢控行動,咁將來就會有人以此為口實,同埋會成個攪事份子既案例,以警方選擇性執法為抗辯理由脫罪,真係想見到將來有人破壞公物、打警察等等行為而可以逍遙法外?宏觀d啦!


洋房

積分: 193


發表於 05-12-21 23:46 |顯示全部帖子

Re: 簽名支持釋放韓農

香港係法治之區,如果法庭判佢地無罪咪放囉,如果佢地被判有罪要服刑的話,就算有多多簽名都唔可以放格。

你要相信香港的司法制度,律師自會幫佢地申辯,我亦都相信法官會作出公正的裁決,不會冤枉好人。 :-P


禁止訪問

積分: 3143


發表於 05-12-21 23:52 |顯示全部帖子

Re: 簽名支持釋放韓農

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


洋房

積分: 307


發表於 05-12-21 23:53 |顯示全部帖子

Re: 簽名支持釋放韓農

請相信香港的法律,市民的眼睛,給警察們一個尊嚴吧...人人犯了事,其他人勇躍去簽名要求釋放,我們的城市還有人保護我們嗎???


大宅

積分: 1441


發表於 05-12-22 03:42 |顯示全部帖子

Re: 簽名支持釋放韓農

我都相香港的法律公平、公正,警方一定有證有句先會落案告d示威人示,冇就一定會放人,無需簽名支持釋放韓農


洋房

積分: 193


發表於 05-12-22 10:52 |顯示全部帖子

Re: 簽名支持釋放韓農

評「世貿對發展中國家弊大於利」的種種謬論�文﹕宋恩榮 2005年12月22日

【明報專訊】世貿第六次部長級會議在達成有限度協議下閉幕,如果餘下談判順利,《香港宣言》將成世界經濟史的里程碑。《香港宣言》特別照顧窮困的利益,規定發達國家向所有最不發達國家的產品提供免稅和免配額的市場准入,估計最不發達國家每年可因此獲80億美元的收益。此外發達國家取消棉花出口補貼,估計撒哈拉以南非洲國家的棉花出口可因此增加七成五。

在世貿會議期間香港傳媒天天充塞


禁止訪問

積分: 15528


發表於 05-12-22 11:13 |顯示全部帖子

Re: 簽名支持釋放韓農

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


子爵府

積分: 11702


發表於 05-12-22 21:20 |顯示全部帖子

Re: 簽名支持釋放韓農

不如開多個TOPIC 簽名支持釋放強姦犯~~黑社會~~殺人犯~~葉繼歡~~刑事毀壞犯人~~~呀笨!!

韓農大晒咩!! :tongue:
簽你個死人頭呀!


珍珠宮

積分: 38085


發表於 05-12-22 21:42 |顯示全部帖子

Re: 簽名支持釋放韓農

無罪自然會釋放
不必我地小市民操心


大宅

積分: 3958


發表於 05-12-23 00:13 |顯示全部帖子

Re: 簽名支持釋放韓農

身為香港居民,我看見一班人攪事,看見那些恐佈場面.....令我有不安全感覺,佢地有自由去示威表達,但唔可以以暴力去表達,發洩,我好驚果日會有人踩人意外,我支持控告那些攪事


珊瑚宮

積分: 122359


發表於 05-12-23 00:22 |顯示全部帖子

Re: 簽名支持釋放韓農

BeautyPinky 寫道:
不如開多個TOPIC 簽名支持釋放強姦犯~~黑社會~~殺人犯~~葉繼歡~~刑事毀壞犯人~~~呀笨!!

韓農大晒咩!! :tongue:
簽你個死人頭呀!


好笑又好


伯爵府

積分: 17023

好媽媽勳章


發表於 05-12-23 00:29 |顯示全部帖子

Re: 簽名支持釋放韓農

SandyKL 寫道:
[quote]
BeautyPinky 寫道:
不如開多個TOPIC 簽名支持釋放強姦犯~~黑社會~~殺人犯~~葉繼歡~~刑事毀壞犯人~~~呀笨!!

韓農大晒咩!! :tongue:
簽你個死人頭呀!


好笑又好


珊瑚宮

積分: 113477

好媽媽勳章


發表於 05-12-23 00:40 |顯示全部帖子

Re: 簽名支持釋放韓農

BeautyPinky 寫道:
不如開多個TOPIC 簽名支持釋放強姦犯~~黑社會~~殺人犯~~葉繼歡~~刑事毀壞犯人~~~呀笨!!

韓農大晒咩!! :tongue:
簽你個死人頭呀!



簽名支持BeautyPinky


禁止訪問

積分: 15528


發表於 05-12-23 00:43 |顯示全部帖子

Re: 簽名支持釋放韓農

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

首頁
12

尾頁

跳至